# SyntheticGrids.jl: Part 2

Author: Eric Perim

## Usage

For the package repository, visit Github.

In the first part, we discussed the motivation and model behind SyntheticGrids.jl. In this post we show how to use it.

To use SyntheticGrids.jl, Julia 0.6.1 or newer is required. Once Julia is properly installed, the package can be installed via

julia> Pkg.add("SyntheticGrids")


This should take care of all dependencies. In order to check if the package has been properly installed, use

julia> Pkg.test("SyntheticGrids")


### A (very) simple test example

As an introduction to the package, we start by automatically generating a small, but complete grid.

julia> using SyntheticGrids

julia> grid = Grid(false);


This command generates a complete grid corresponding to the region contained in the box defined by latitude [33, 35] and longitude [-95, -93] (default values). It automatically places loads and generators and builds the transmission line network (we will soon see how to do each of these steps manually). Here, false determines that substations will not be created. Note the addition of the semicolon, ;, at the end of the command. This has just cosmetic effect in suppressing the printing of the resulting object in the REPL. Even a small grid object corresponds to a reasonably large amount of data.

A Grid object has several attributes that can be inspected. First, let’s look at the buses:

julia> length(buses(grid))
137

julia> buses(grid)[1]
id=1,
coords=LatLon(lat=33.71503°, lon=-93.166445°),
voltage=200,
population=87,
connected_to=Set{Bus}(...)
connections=Set{TransLine}(...)
)

julia> buses(grid)[end]
GenBus(
id=137
coords=LatLon(lat=34.4425°, lon=-93.0262°),
generation=56.0
voltage=Real[115.0],
tech_type=AbstractString["Conventional Hydroelectric"],
connected_to=Set{Bus}(...)
connections=Set{TransLine}(...)
pfactor=0.9
summgen=61.8
wintgen=62.0
gens=SyntheticGrids.Generator[SyntheticGrids.Generator(LatLon(lat=34.4425°, lon=-93.0262°), Real[115.0], "Conventional Hydroelectric", 28.0, 0.9, 15.0, 30.9, 31.0, "1H", "OP"), SyntheticGrids.Generator(LatLon(lat=34.4425°, lon=-93.0262°), Real[115.0], "Conventional Hydroelectric", 28.0, 0.9, 15.0, 30.9, 31.0, "1H", "OP")]
)


We see that our grid has a total of 137 buses (see Figure 2 for a visualisation of the result). The first is a load bus (LoadBus). The values of the attributes connected_to and connections are not explicitly printed. However, the printing of (...) indicates that those sets have been populated (otherwise, they would be printed as ()).

Visualisation of two grids generated using the procedure described here. Notice that both present the same bus locations, as their placement is entirely deterministic. The transmission line topology however is different in each case, as it is generated through an stochastic process. Note that the generated grids are non-planar.

The last bus of the list corresponds to a generator (GenBus). One important thing to notice here is that it contains an attribute called gens, which is an array of Generator-type objects. GenBuses represent power plants, which may (or may not, as is the case here) contain several different generating units. These individual generating units are stored within the gens attribute.

We can also inspect the transmission lines:

julia> length(trans_lines(grid))
167

julia> trans_lines(grid)[1]
TransLine(
id=3,
coords=LatLon(lat=33.889332°, lon=-93.097793°),
voltage=100,
population=4090,
connected_to=Set{Bus}(...)
connections=Set{TransLine}(...)
id=1,
coords=LatLon(lat=33.71503°, lon=-93.166445°),
voltage=200,
population=87,
connected_to=Set{Bus}(...)
connections=Set{TransLine}(...)
)),
impedance=0.9175166312451004,
capacity=1400
)


There are 167 transmission lines in our grid. By looking at the first one, we see that they are defined by a tuple of Bus-type objects (here both are LoadBuses), by an impedance value (here taken as Real, since the package has been developed with DC OPF in mind), and a current carrying capacity value.

The adjacency matrix of the system can also be easily accessed:

julia> adjacency(grid)
137×137 SparseMatrixCSC{Bool,Int64} with 334 stored entries:
[3  ,   1]  =  true
[6  ,   1]  =  true
[15 ,   1]  =  true
[34 ,   1]  =  true
[35 ,   1]  =  true
[4  ,   2]  =  true
⋮
[54 , 135]  =  true
[58 , 135]  =  true
[67 , 135]  =  true
[73 , 136]  =  true
[42 , 137]  =  true
[46 , 137]  =  true


Notice that we use a sparse matrix representation for better efficiency.

Substations can also be inspected, but we did not create any, so the result should be empty:

julia> substations(grid)
0-element Array{SyntheticGrids.Substation,1}


That can be remedied by changing the boolean value when creating the grid:

julia> grid = Grid(true);

julia> length(substations(grid))
43

julia> substations(grid)[end]
Substation(
id=43
coords=LatLon(lat=34.412130070351765°, lon=-93.11856562311557°),
voltages=Real[115.0],
generation=199.0,
population=0,
connected_to=Set{Substation}(...)
grouping=SyntheticGrids.Bus[GenBus(
id=137
coords=LatLon(lat=34.4425°, lon=-93.0262°),
generation=56.0
voltage=Real[115.0],
tech_type=AbstractString["Conventional Hydroelectric"],
connected_to=Set{Bus}(...)
connections=Set{TransLine}(...)
pfactor=0.9
summgen=61.8
wintgen=62.0
gens=SyntheticGrids.Generator[SyntheticGrids.Generator(LatLon(lat=34.4425°, lon=-93.0262°), Real[115.0], "Conventional Hydroelectric", 28.0, 0.9, 15.0, 30.9, 31.0, "1H", "OP"), SyntheticGrids.Generator(LatLon(lat=34.4425°, lon=-93.0262°), Real[115.0], "Conventional Hydroelectric", 28.0, 0.9, 15.0, 30.9, 31.0, "1H", "OP")]
), GenBus(
id=135
coords=LatLon(lat=34.570984°, lon=-93.194425°),
generation=75.0
voltage=Real[115.0],
tech_type=AbstractString["Conventional Hydroelectric"],
connected_to=Set{Bus}(...)
connections=Set{TransLine}(...)
pfactor=0.9
summgen=75.0
wintgen=75.0
gens=SyntheticGrids.Generator[SyntheticGrids.Generator(LatLon(lat=34.570984°, lon=-93.194425°), Real[115.0], "Conventional Hydroelectric", 37.5, 0.9, 20.0, 37.5, 37.5, "10M", "OP"), SyntheticGrids.Generator(LatLon(lat=34.570984°, lon=-93.194425°), Real[115.0], "Conventional Hydroelectric", 37.5, 0.9, 20.0, 37.5, 37.5, "10M", "OP")]
), GenBus(
id=136
coords=LatLon(lat=34.211913°, lon=-93.110963°),
generation=68.0
voltage=Real[115.0],
tech_type=AbstractString["Hydroelectric Pumped Storage", "Conventional Hydroelectric"],
connected_to=Set{Bus}(...)
connections=Set{TransLine}(...)
pfactor=0.95
summgen=68.0
wintgen=68.0
gens=SyntheticGrids.Generator[SyntheticGrids.Generator(LatLon(lat=34.211913°, lon=-93.110963°), Real[115.0], "Conventional Hydroelectric", 40.0, 0.95, 15.0, 40.0, 40.0, "1H", "OP"), SyntheticGrids.Generator(LatLon(lat=34.211913°, lon=-93.110963°), Real[115.0], "Hydroelectric Pumped Storage", 28.0, 0.95, 15.0, 28.0, 28.0, "1H", "OP")]
)]
)


By changing the boolean value to true we now create substations (with default values; more into that later) and can inspect them.

### A more complete workflow

Let’s now build a grid step by step. First, we start by generating an empty grid:

julia> using SyntheticGrids

julia> grid = Grid()
SyntheticGrids.Grid(2872812514497267479, SyntheticGrids.Bus[], SyntheticGrids.TransLine[], SyntheticGrids.Substation[], Array{Bool}(0,0), Array{Int64}(0,0))


Notice that one of the attributes has been automatically initialised. That corresponds to the seed which will be used for all stochastic steps. Control over the seed value gives us control over reproducibility. Conversely, that value could have been specified via grid = Grid(seed).

Now let’s place the load buses. We could do this by specifying latitude and longitude limits (e.g.: place_loads_from_zips!(grid; latlim = (30, 35), longlim = (-99, -90))), but let’s look at a more general way of doing this. We can define any function that receives a tuple containing a latitude–longitude pair and returns true if within the desired region and false otherwise:

julia> my_region(x::Tuple{Float64, Float64}, r::Float64) = ((x[1] - 33)^2 + (x[2] + 95)^2 < r^2)
my_region (generic function with 1 method)

julia> f(x) = my_region(x, 5.)
f (generic function with 1 method)

julia> length(buses(grid))
3287


Here, my_region defines a circle (in latitude-longitude space) of radius r around the point (33, -95). Any zip code within that region is added to the grid (to a total of 3287) as a load bus. The same can be done for the generators:

julia> place_gens_from_data!(grid, f)

julia> length(buses(grid))
3729


This command adds all generators within the same region, bringing the total amount of buses to 3729.

We can also manually add extra load or generation buses if we wish:

julia> a_bus = LoadBus((22., -95.), 12., 200, 12345)
id=-1,
coords=LatLon(lat=22.0°, lon=-95.0°),
voltage=200,
population=12345,
connected_to=Set{Bus}()
connections=Set{Transline}()
)

julia> length(buses(grid))
3730


The same works for GenBuses.

Once all buses are in place, it is time to connect them with transmission lines. This can be done via a single function (this step can take some time for larger grids):

julia> connect!(grid)

julia> length(trans_lines(grid))
0


This function goes through the stochastic process of creating the system’s adjacency matrix, but it does not create the actual TransLine objects (hence the zero length). That is done via the create_lines! function. Also note that connect! has several parameters for which we adopted default values. For a description of those, see ? connect.

Before we create the lines, it is interesting to revisit adding new buses. Now that we have created the adjacency matrix for the network, we have two options when adding a new bus: either we redo the connect! step in order to incorporate the new bus in the grid, or we simply extend the adjacency matrix to include the new bus (which won’t have any connections). This is controlled by the reconnect keyword argument that can be passed to add_bus!. In the former case, one uses reconnect = false (the default option); connections can always be manually added by editing the adjacency matrix (and the connected_to fields of the involved buses).

Once the adjacency matrix is ready, TransLine objects are created by invoking the create_lines! function:

julia> SyntheticGrids.create_lines!(grid)

julia> length(trans_lines(grid))
4551


We have generated the connection topology with transmission line objects. Finally, we may want to coarse-grain the grid. This is done via the cluster! function, which receives as arguments the number of each type of cluster: load, both load and generation or pure generation. This step may also take a little while for large grids.

julia> length(substations(grid))
0

julia> cluster!(grid, 1500, 20, 200)

julia> length(substations(grid))
1700


At this point, the whole grid has been generated. If you wish to save it, the functions save and load_grid are available. Please note that the floating-point representation of numbers may lead to infinitesimal changes to the values when saving and reloading a grid. Besides precision issues, they should be equivalent.

julia> save(grid, "./test_grid.json")



Some simple statistics can be computed over the grid, such as the average node degree and the clustering coefficient:

julia> mean_node_deg(adjacency(grid))
2.4402144772117964

0.08598360707539486


The generated grid can easily be exported to pandapower in order to carry out powerflow studies. The option to export to PowerModels.jl should be added soon.

julia> pgrid = to_pandapower(grid)
PyObject This pandapower network includes the following parameter tables:
- trafo (913 elements)
- ext_grid (1 elements)
- bus_geodata (3730 elements)
- bus (3730 elements)
- line (3638 elements)
- gen (1397 elements)


## Conclusion

Hopefully, this post helped as a first introduction to the SyntheticGrids.jl package. There are more functions which have not been mentioned here; the interested reader should refer to the full documentation for a complete list of methods. This is an ongoing project, and, as such, several changes and additions might still happen. The most up-to-date version can always be found at Github.

# SyntheticGrids.jl: Part 1

Author: Eric Perim

## Background

For the package repository, visit Github.

It should come as no surprise that electricity plays a vital role in many aspects of modern life. From reading this article, to running essential hospital equipment, or powering your brand-new Tesla, many things that we take for granted would not be possible without the generation and transmission of electrical power. This is only possible due to extensive power grids, which connect power producers with consumers through a very complex network of towers, transmission lines, transformers etc. Needless to say, it is important to understand the peculiarities of these systems in order to avoid large scale blackouts, or your toaster burning out due to a fluctuation in the current.

Power grid research requires testing in realistic, large-scale, electric networks. Real power grids may have tens of thousands of nodes (also called buses), interconnected by multiple power lines each, spanning hundreds of thousands of square kilometers. In light of security concerns, most information on these power grids is considered sensitive and is not available to the general public or to most researchers. This has led to most power transmission studies being done using only a few publicly available test grids 1, 2. These test grids tend to be too small to capture the complexity of real grids, severely limiting the practical applications of such research. With this in mind, there has recently been an effort in developing methods for building realistic synthetic grids, based only on publicly available information. These synthetic grids are based on real power grids and present analogous statistical properties—such as the geographic distribution of load and generation, total load, and generator types—while not actually exposing potentially sensitive information about a real grid.

The pioneers in treating power grids as networks were Watts and Strogatz3, when they pointed out that electric grids share similarities with small-world networks: networks that are highly clustered, but exhibit small characteristic path lengths due to a few individual nodes being directly connected to distant nodes (see Figure 1). This type of network is very useful in explaining social networks— see six degrees of Kevin Bacon—but, despite similarities, power grids differ from small-world networks 4,5. If you are looking for an extensive list of studies on power grids, Pagani and Aiello 6 is a good place to start.

Some examples of different network topologies containing 20 nodes and 40 edges. (a) Small-world; (b) random; (c) scale-free (exponent 2). For more details, see Watts and Strogatz3.

In order to study the dynamic properties of electric grids, some research has adopted simplified topologies, such as tree structures 7 or ring structures 8, which may fail to capture relevant aspects of the system. Efforts to build complete and realistic synthetic grids are a much more recent phenomenon. The effort of two teams is particularly relevant for this post, namely, Overbye’s team 9,10,11 and Soltan and Zussman 12.

Considering the potential impact of synthetic grids in the study of power grids and the recency of these approaches, we at Invenia Labs have developed SyntheticGrids.jl, an open source Julia package. The central idea of SyntheticGrids.jl is to provide a standalone and easily expandable framework for generating synthetic grids, adopting assumptions based on research by Overbye’s and Zussman’s teams. Currently, it only works for grids within the territory of the US, but it should be easily extendable to other regions, provided there is similar data available.

There are two key sources of data for the placement of loads and generators: USA census data and EIA generator survey data. The former is used to locate and size loads, while the latter is used for generators. Since there is no sufficiently granular location-based consumption data available, loads are built based on population patterns. Load has a nearly linear correlation with population size 12, so we adopt census population as a proxy for load. Further, loads are sited at each zip code location available in the census data. When placing generators, the EIA data provides us with all the necessary information, including geographic location, nameplate capacity, technology type, etc. This procedure is completely deterministic, since we want be as true as possible to the real grid structure, i.e. we want to use an unaltered version of the real data.

Our package treats power grids as a collection of buses connected by transmission lines. Buses can be either load or generation buses. Each generation bus represents a different power plant, so it may group several distinct generators together. Further, buses can be combined into substations, providing a coarse-grained description of the grid.

The coarse-graining of the buses into substations, if desired, is done via a simple hierarchical clustering procedure, as proposed by Birchfield et al. 9. This stochastic approach starts with each bus being its own cluster. At each step, the two most similar clusters (determined by the similarity measure of choice) are fused into one, and these steps continue until a stopping criterion has been reached. This allows the grouping of multiple load and generator units, similarly to what is actually done by Independent System Operators (ISOs).

In contrast to loads and generators, there is no publicly available data on transmission lines, so we have to adopt heuristics. The procedure implemented in the package is based on that proposed by Soltan and Zussman 12. It adopts several realistic considerations in order to stochastically generate the whole transmission network, which are summarised in the following three main principles:

The degree distributions of power grids are very similar to those of scale-free networks [see: Scale-free network], but grids have less degree 1 and 2 nodes and do not have very high degree nodes.

It is inefficient and unsafe for the power grids to include very long lines.

Nodes in denser areas are more likely to have higher degree.

Currently, SyntheticGrids.jl allows its generated grids to be directly exported to pandapower, a Python-based powerflow package. Soon, an interface with PowerModels.jl, a Julia-based powerflow package, will also be provided.

In the second part we will go over how to use the main features of the package.

## References

1. Power Systems Test Case Archive (UWEE) - http://www2.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca/

2. Power Cases - Illinois Center for a Smarter Electric Grid (ICSEG) - http://icseg.iti.illinois.edu/power-cases

3. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. nature, 393(6684), 440-442. Chicago  2

4. Hines, P., Blumsack, S., Sanchez, E. C., & Barrows, C. (2010, January). The topological and electrical structure of power grids. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1-10). IEEE.

5. Cotilla-Sanchez, E., Hines, P. D., Barrows, C., & Blumsack, S. (2012). Comparing the topological and electrical structure of the North American electric power infrastructure. IEEE Systems Journal, 6(4), 616-626.

6. Pagani, G. A., & Aiello, M. (2013). The power grid as a complex network: a survey. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 392(11), 2688-2700.

7. Carreras, B. A., Lynch, V. E., Dobson, I., & Newman, D. E. (2002). Critical points and transitions in an electric power transmission model for cascading failure blackouts. Chaos: An interdisciplinary journal of nonlinear science, 12(4), 985-994.

8. Parashar, M., Thorp, J. S., & Seyler, C. E. (2004). Continuum modeling of electromechanical dynamics in large-scale power systems. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 51(9), 1848-1858.

9. Birchfield, A. B., Xu, T., Gegner, K. M., Shetye, K. S., & Overbye, T. J. (2017). Grid structural characteristics as validation criteria for synthetic networks. IEEE Transactions on power systems, 32(4), 3258-3265. Chicago  2

10. Birchfield, A. B., Gegner, K. M., Xu, T., Shetye, K. S., & Overbye, T. J. (2017). Statistical considerations in the creation of realistic synthetic power grids for geomagnetic disturbance studies. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 32(2), 1502-1510. Chicago

11. Gegner, K. M., Birchfield, A. B., Xu, T., Shetye, K. S., & Overbye, T. J. (2016, February). A methodology for the creation of geographically realistic synthetic power flow models. In Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI), 2016 IEEE (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

12. Soltan, Saleh, and Gil Zussman. “Generation of synthetic spatially embedded power grid networks.” arXiv:1508.04447 [cs.SY], Aug. 2015.  2 3

# Welcome to our blog

Author: Invenia Team

Welcome to the Invenia blog!

Our day to day work at Invenia is focused on improving the efficiency of electricity grids—large and complex systems, where failures can cause significant financial and human losses, and improper operation can to lead to large environmental costs as well. Improvements in planning and other operations can directly decrease the environmental impact of energy generation and increase the reliability of the entire system.

Our larger mission is to use use machine learning along with modern software and computing tools to tackle important and difficult problems. Due to the nature of this work, we get to explore many areas of software development, modern programming languages (such as Julia), distributed computing, all aspects of the energy system, machine learning, and interesting data.

The goals of this blog are to share some of our work, to discuss the above topics more generally (in a clear and pedagogical way), and to start interesting conversations. We hope you enjoy it and we look forward to receiving feedback.